Now, the depths of the IPCC's entanglement with the non-peer reviewed activism of the World Wildlife Fund is being plumbed. Via Watts Up With That:
... it turns out that the WWF is cited all over the IPCC AR4 report, and as you know, WWF does not produce peer reviewed science, they produce opinion papers in line with their vision. Yet IPCC’s rules are such that they are supposed to rely on peer reviewed science only. It appears they’ve violated that rule dozens of times ...
A new posting authored by Canadian blogger Donna Laframboise, the creator of NOconsensus.org, shows what one can find in just one day of looking.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome. I prefer you didn't post anonymously.
To keep it civil, comments are moderated. I reserve the right to decide what appears on my blog.