Friday, November 13, 2009

More AGW Questions From The Times

Is this a trend? At the Times of London, more coverage of science contrary to the received wisdom of anthropogenic global warming.

I am fed up though, with the blatant Alinsky-isms "global warming deniers" and "climate change skeptics". These labels are used by the warmists to "freeze" and "polarize" their enemies. Why, if the science is so settled, do the warmists require such hard-left political tactics to support their cause?

From the comments:
Every scientist should be a skeptic, but since this is a political debate and not a scientific debate the real scientists are labeled as "deniers" and "sceptics." The true believers in the cult of MMGW should be labeled as "deacons" or "priests" or "grand poo-bahs" of Al Gore's made up religion.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments are welcome. I prefer you didn't post anonymously.

To keep it civil, comments are moderated. I reserve the right to decide what appears on my blog.